The Evolution of God
God, probably the worst understood phenomenon that we have.
I too believe in God, but one of a different type. To me god is a force, the ultimate force. Why ? cos if God created the earth, the sun the moon and the stars. Who the hell created God ? To me god lies in actions and deeds. The god thats stops a murderer in front of his victim and turn away. The god that feeds a hungry man who is an inch from starving to death. The god that heals a mortal wound, the god that feels the pain of others. That to me is real god. The power of human spirit and self sacrifice that is capable of making a difference in other lives. Traces of this god is clearly visible in all cultures and I feel that it is so neatly hidden within all our faiths that only those who realise the true inner meaning of their faith are able to reach that state of enlightenment.

There most definitely is a supreme power, a power that watches above us all, it is in a sort of dynamic equilibrium that is defined by our actions. The more good we do i.e the more actions we do help others the closer we get to the force and our ultimate aim being to become one with the force. It is not about committing your sins and dipping yourself in the ganges and expect to be cleansed of all your evil deeds, or killing and raping innumerable people and visiting mecca or undertaking haj, or confessing your evil deeds to the priest. No its not that, if you really are devoted to God, you wont even do those actions. The voice of God is in all of us, and more so in small kids, its closely related to our conscience, the more we commit sins, the softer the voice of our conscience gets, the more we restrain from commiting those sins the louder our conscience gets. So all these pilgrimages and crap is nothing but the making of greedy human beings who want to control the minds of the people who are very happy committing sins, god is not your servant, he isn't your coolie you cant just pay him and get your slate wiped clean. So your making god nothing more than the boy who cleans my car everyday, a daily wage coolie who does your dirty work for money, is that it ?

But lets leave that for another day, the object of this post is more for finding out who or what creates a God. Jesus is considered to be the son of god himself, the messiah of the people, but is he ? or was he just a smart man who created a difference in many lives and planned his exit from the world so well that centuries later his deeds are considered to be supernatural and thus being proclaimed as faith and as god himself. I don't get that part though, why do most christians call jesus the son of god ? and still say jesus is the only god.... ? lol ive heard them say this sorta stuff too many times to count. Guys he is just the son of god. If god can have a son, he can have cousins, daughters, wives, mistresses so on and so forth.
So now, let us look at Gandhi, 60 odd years after his demise we regard him great faith, and there are countries which still erect statues of him for his great service to humanity and he too, could have timed his death so perfectly well, just like jesus did. Nathuram Gotse could have been his most faithful follower who killed him. So that he dies the death of a martyr, so that 600 years later he too becomes an equal to god, or like jesus, a god. Just another cog in the grand scheme of things is what it looks like.

Every few centuries we get these most amazing personalities who change the course of the world, for better or for worse, maybe these are the gods that we so proclaim, maybe these are the devils too. Budhism, Jainism, Jewism to name a very few are pretty much the same thing. Well planned mastermined lives that change the course and influence enough people to be granted the status of gods, faiths and religions. I am not saying these people are not gods, they most definitley are. But they are gods not because of some ultra uncomprehendable power, but because of the human will and the power of human spirit which made them dare beyond the normal and make a difference to thousands of humans whome they touched.

So you never know, one day, when you are one with the great force and looking down on your bloodline, you might find them worshiping mahatma Gandhi, or Martin Luther King Jr or Aung Sang Suu Kyi ( hope i spelt that rite ) . To me God is not supernatural, god is the power in all of us, it is our choice whether to grow it or slowly kill it, and that makes us what we are. Heroes or everything but a hero.

As one great man said.. with great power comes great responsibility.

Cheers
=>> the stone with a heart
An Indian for India
My India

I had visited Karur, a small town near Trichy, in Tamil Nadu . We had gone there for a relatives wedding. As all Indian weddings have it, we socialized, met up with long lost relatives and got to know of people whom I didn’t seem to remember. My mom was the only person in her element. She seemed to know everyone and anyone, and if she didn’t know anyone she would unabashedly go up to them, and introduce herself telling and complementing them on how beautiful they look in that saree. Now who would not want to be friends with someone who compliments you on the first time you meet! They chit chat and exchange views on everything from the petrol prices to how aunty’s blouse isn’t matching with her nail polish!

But that is not what we are going to discuss in this post. In our sea of boredom, my brother, my dad and myself decide we cannot hang around smiling with all 32 each time we see someone, laughing at all their jokes and whatever they say just grinning back in acceptance! We decide to go on a movie. There are only three theatres in Karur I think, two of them running the same movie. We decide to go for the 10.45 show and reach the theatre by 10.00. I stand in queue and get tickets for us. Each costing a handsome 100 ruppes. I am pretty shocked that it costs so much, even in Chennai the costliest ticket bought right off the counter is only Rs120. We stand in another queue to get in, which limits itself by the wall on one side and a metal railing on the other. On entering the building we notice another counter. Here in this one, a man takes the ticket that we have been given and hands us a real ticket which says Rs25! We were just fleeced! Actually, everyone was fleeced, the theatre ain’t exactly full, but it isn’t sparsely populated either. The theatre guys made a killing 400% margin on the ticket without paying a single paise as tax! But that isn’t what surprised me, what really knocked my rocker was that there were so many people buying tickets for Rs100 and 80 in a small weaver village in a third world country. I doubted whether their daily wage was that amount!

Then it dawned upon me, money is actually percolating into the smaller towns and villages and the people of our country are having more spending power than we imagined. We city folk think twice before spending on a hundred rupee ticket for a movie, even though our parents earn that, followed by a couple of zeros every month. So where do these people get this sort of money from, money where they can afford a three hour entertainment for a hundred rupees! I just guess they get most of their necessities taken care of. Free TV sets, rice at Rs2 per kilo, free education, free cycles, now even laptops for the toppers, the list goes on !

Later on the day we met a jeweler, he told us how his gold business was booming all year round and how he is doing very well. We asked him, if he really is doing so well in such a non metro why doesn’t he branch out into Chennai ? He coyly smiled at us and told us that the city folk hardly ever spend. People from the simplest of backgrounds walk into his shop and walk out with a kilogram of gold, all paid in full by cash.

Money is surely reaching the common man, so I don’t really think he is common any more. Rural India is consuming so many luxuries that it is quiet unbelievable. I saw fancy cars in Karur which I would find tough to spot in Chennai.

India really is growing, and growing fast. What we thought of the average Indian village is being redefined even as we speak. The only thing, we don’t get to know. The sad thing, less than 2% of the population pays income tax. With wealth percolating into the smaller towns it is high time we look at the bigger picture here. We are growing out of that shell and it is time we awake. What we wait for, is a leader.






=>> the stone with a heart
Economics of Employable Engineering Education
We are at the time of the year where the fee structure of engineering education is debated hotly by various stake holders. There is also proposal to have uniform fee structure across the country. Political parties particularly in the opposition demand reduction of fees and higher quota for government single window admission. However there is no talk about the quality of the education and standards across a broad spectrum of private and government colleges, most of them languishing without adequate infrastructure and teaching staff. None talks about the quality of the education and how that could be measured for the market to determine what is acceptable fees for the 4 years of engineering education. All branches were considered to be of equal and charged the about the same fees and it is well known that the so called circuit branches is in great demand in a cyclical curve.  

The country is currently facing an enormous talent crunch and this is greatly affecting the bottom line of every man power dependant company and I’d like to specifically mention the IT & ITES sector.
 
Several committees on the fee structure have come and gone but none have provided a long lasting solution for the burning issue. Why we mention the fee structure when we are talking about employability is because only with adequate fees can a college train its students to suite industry needs. But with a uniform fee structure throughout all colleges we are only punishing the good colleges for providing more employable professionals and protecting the bad colleges so they can continue their shoddy business minded activities. 

One solution to the fee structure is what we in the BPO sector call output/outcome based pricing. Currently the Justice N V Balasubramanian Committee is calculating the fees structure on input based factors such as the running cost of the college, expansion cost and the like. This is irrelevant since they are taking into consideration that all colleges are paying their staff uniform salaries and having the same quality of infrastructure thus having same running costs. Why then does the AICTE grade colleges based on their quality and performance? 

The output based structure is to allow every college to set their fees individually based on the performance of the outgoing batch. That is, if the average salary of the outgoing batch is Rs.4 lakhs per annum, then the college can charge a percentage of that as their fees. If students from backward sections of society are not able to pay the fees of say Rs80,000 per annum they can avail a student loan from banks which will have tie ups with the particular college. After finishing their graduation the bank will receive the student’s degree certificate and hold it as security till he repays the loan and providing a provisional certificate to the employer. 

If this method is employed, all colleges will be striving to place their students in better jobs and make every one of them employable against the current scenario of churning out students like a bakery does with bread. Colleges will invest in quality teachers and better infrastructure as the average salary of the outgoing batch will decide the fee of the incoming batch. If there are number of students that do not get placed an agreed percentage (in relation to the proportion of students not securing placements within the final year) of the average salary can be deducted when calculating the fees since the college could not make those student employable. Similarly give positive credit (higher fees) when students opt for higher studies within India or abroad. 

The problem of a student not being able to afford the fees charged by the private colleges and government intervention for the same can be avoided in a transparent way where the students (actually parents in most cases!!) get to choose the branch and the college based on employability potential. Companies determine entry level salaries for each year based on inflation, demand and supply. Thus correlating fees to the outcome (average salary) automatically takes care of inflation, standard of the education imparted and demand for various streams of engineering. As the outcome of good quality education is measured by the employability of the batch, we can possibly remove the great disparity among the colleges of various hues run with profit motive. Income tax rebate on student loans can be suitably modified to allow for more money in the student’s hands to enable them to pay back the loan to the banks.

The ‘one size fits all’ fee structure is neither helping good institutions aiming for academic excellence nor the poor students who are supposed to be protected by the uniform fee structure with no correlation to their future. The entire admission process would become less intense as a student can get to choose the branch and the college without any uncertainty of their employability.

This fee model would take care of the vast demand for certain courses, if student are attracted to a particular college and course and the fees for this is determined by the department’s output. This would enable the colleges to invest in better professors and expand infrastructure capability to allow more number of students for their particular branch. AICTE should allow different fee structure for different branches within the same college and allow them to expand the number of seats based on the set criteria. Thus colleges have to innovate and modify their teaching curriculum as per the demands from the corporate sector and close down irrelevant courses where demand from the industry is poor. 

This may sound capitalistic but it will be truly beneficial to the students. The buyer pays for the quality of education offered. This will force institutions with a profit motive which are currently protected by the recommended fee structure and single window system of admission to clean up their act and start producing quality engineers or else they face extinction. The student is guaranteed to get what he pays for without any considerable risk of finishing four years of engineering and being left without a job because his college did not deliver what was promised. So basically, supply will not only meet demand but demand will determine supply in terms of quality and quantity. Now isn’t that the ideal scenario ?
  • The Support

    Should we have a Meeting every Saturday?